|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@attorneymarkstevens.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
DWI CASE EXAMPLE 5:
CLIENT STOPPED FOR DRIVING 86 MILES PER HOUR & ADMITS TO DRINKING TWO MIXED COCKTAILS
Please note-this is an example of the disposition of a recent New Hampshire DWI case.
It is by no means a guaranty of any particular result in any other case.
BASIC FACTS: A state trooper clocked the defendant on radar at 86 miles per hour
in a 55 mile per hour zone in Interstate 93. The trooper began to pursue
the defendant passed and stopped him on the side of the highway.
The defendant pulled the car over and the trooper’s questioning began. The trooper
detected a very strong odor of alcohol coming from the defendant’s car.
The defendant admitted drinking two mixed cocktails earlier in the night.
The trooper ordered the defendant out of his car to and then conducted a series of
“field sobriety tests” on the defendant. The defendant allegedly “failed” a
“horizontal gaze nystagmus” (“HGN”) test, a “walk and turn test” and a
“one leg stand test”. The trooper testified that the defendant stepped off the line and
failed to walk in heel-to-toe fashion during the walk-and-turn test. He also
testified that the defendant put his foot down four times with each foot on the
one leg stand test and
could not hold his leg in the air for longer that a count of 4.
The defendant was arrested for driving while intoxicated (DWI). The defendant
refused to submit to any
breath test or blood test. He decided to fight the case.
DEFENSE: Actual innocence.
TRIAL RESULT: The state presented the testimony of the state trooper who
the field sobriety tests. Attorney Stevens questioned the trooper about numerous
“cues of impairment” that are typically found during field sobriety tests that
were not present in this case. Additionally, Attorney Stevens pointed out the
many normal, ordinary responses the defendant performed and said correctly
during the roadside encounter with the trooper.
After trial, the defendant was found NOT GUILTY of this DWI charge. He left
the courthouse with no
DWI conviction on his record and drove home a free man!
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!
Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email,
please include ONLY the following information:
I will call you back at the earliest opportunity.
Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice
message or email. We will discuss
that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.
Back to Top of This Page
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice
and does not constitute an
engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated
with the Mark Stevens
Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general
nature and may not apply to any
particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that
laws change frequently. We will
make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but
are under no obligation to do so. No
part of this document, nor any information contained in this website,
may be disseminated without this
paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
www.1-800-dial-dui.com
Copyright 2005, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.