Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway
Salem, NH 03079
Telephone: (603) 893-0074
Fax: (603) 893-5022
info@attorneymarkstevens.com
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals.


CASE EXAMPLE-WEEK OF DECEMBER 22, 2006

BOATING WHILE INTOXICATED (“BWI”) VICTORY

CLIENT RAN ONTO A ROCK WHILE BOATING-

BREATH TEST RESULTS WERE .16 AND .17

Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com

Please note-this is an example of the disposition of a recent New Hampshire Boating While Intoxicated (BWI) case. It is by no means a guarantee of any particular result in any other case.

BASIC FACTS: The defendant ran into some rocks while boating on a lake in the dark.  The police approached in a boat to help him, but ended up arresting him instead.  The police demanded his license and registration.  Next they ordered him to perform a “safety inspection”, which he passed.  The defendant submitted to a battery of seated gymnastics called “marine field sobriety tests”.  He supposedly failed the “pen test”, also known as the “Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus” test, which is when the officer waives his pen in front of the driver’s face and decides the driver is impaired by alcohol.  He went on to fail the “finger count test”, a “palm pat test”, a “finger to nose test” and a “25 to 1 test” during which the defendant was supposed to count backwards from 25 to 1.  He supposedly missed one of the 25 numbers which the police deemed to be a failure.   Back at the station the defendant blew into the breath test gadget and reportedly blew a .16 and a .17.

DEFENSE:     Attorney Stevens challenged the officer about the alleged “results” of the “field sobriety tests”.  He objected to the admissibility of the breath test.  Attorney Stevens’ technical objection to the breath test was sustained and the results were not admitted at trial.  After trial, the defendant was found:  NOT GUILTY!!!  This driver never lost his right to drive for a single day!!!

RESULT:       NOT GUILTY!!!

Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!!!





Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email, please include ONLY the following information:


I will call you back at the earliest opportunity. Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice message or email. We will discuss that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.

Back to Top of This Page






Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.

www.1-800-dial-dui.com

Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2006, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.