|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@attorneymarkstevens.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE
SUSPENSION VICTORY
ADMINISTRATIVE
LICENSE SUSPENSION FOR REFUSING TO BLOW INTO BREATH TEST BOX REVERSED AND
DISMISSED!!!
WEEK
OF
DWI CASE EXAMPLE: CLIENT ARRESTED FOR DWI THEN SUBMITS TO A BLOOD TEST
REVEALING AN ALLEGED BLOOD ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION OF .03. THE STATE SOUGHT A 180 DAY SUSPENSION OF HIS
RIGHT TO DRIVE BECAUSE THE DRIVER COOPERATED AND GAVE THEM A BLOOD TEST. READ ON TO SEE WHAT HAPPENED…
Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com
Please
note-this is an example of the disposition of a recent
BASIC FACTS: The police stopped a driver based
on speeding. After the stop, the driver
was polite, courteous and cooperative.
The officer smelled an odor of alcohol in the car, but the driver was
not alone in the car at the time. The
officer interrogated the driver about drinking and the driver admitted that he
had consumed a small amount of alcohol earlier in the
day. The officer then directed the
driver to get out of his car for a battery of field sobriety tests.
The officer conducted three field sobriety
tests on the driver. The driver passed
all three tests. Even though the driver
passed every test, the officer arrested him any way. So, even though the driver cooperated and
decided to do these “tests” on the roadside, and even though he passed them all,
and even though his speech was clear and his balance was normal, the officer
arrested him and charged him with DWI.
The officer took the driver to a local
hospital and asked him to submit to a blood test. The driver agreed,
no doubt because he wasn’t drunk.
Unfortunately, the driver was under 21, so his .03 blood reading was
over the legislatively created “limit”.
The state then sought to suspend the driver’s right to drive for 180
days based on the blood result, even though the driver wasn’t drunk.
The defendant elected to hire Attorney
Stevens to challenge the administrative license suspension at a hearing at the department
of safety.
HEARING
PROCEDURE: Attorney Stevens requested a hearing on the defendant’s behalf at
the Department of Safety. Attorney
Stevens challenged everything that the law and the rules allow regarding the alleged
refusal to test. At the hearing, the
state testified that the driver passed very field sobriety test and agreed that
his speech and balance were completely normal.
Attorney Stevens argued that the police officer did not have reasonable
grounds to even ask the driver to take a blood test, and that the state had not
provided the necessary foundation for the admissibility of the blood test. After the hearing, the suspension was
dismissed.
RESULT: ORDER
OF SUSPENSION RESCINDED AND ALS SUSPENSION DISMISSED!!!
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful
defense!!!
TODAY’S
SCRIPTURE:
“For to us a Child
is born, to us a Son is given, and the government shall be on His shoulder, and
His name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father,
Prince of Peace.” Isaiah 9:6.
Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email,
please include ONLY the following information:
I will call you back at the earliest opportunity.
Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice
message or email. We will discuss
that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.
Back to Top of This Page
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice
and does not constitute an
engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated
with the Mark Stevens
Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general
nature and may not apply to any
particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that
laws change frequently. We will
make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but
are under no obligation to do so. No
part of this document, nor any information contained in this website,
may be disseminated without this
paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
www.1-800-dial-dui.com
Copyright 2007, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.