Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway
Salem, NH 03079
Telephone: (603) 893-0074
Fax: (603) 893-5022
info@attorneymarkstevens.com
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals.

DWI CASE EXAMPLE: OCTOBER 2, 2007

CLIENT CHARGED WITH DWI AFTER BEING STOPPED FOR “FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY”-ALLEGED BREATH RESULTS WERE .13/.13

DWI CASE EXAMPLE: DRIVER WAS STOPPED FOR ALLEGEDLY “FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY” ON A STATE HIGHWAY.  HE AGREED TO SUBMIT TO FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS THAT HE SUPPOSEDLY FAILED.  HE BLEW INTO A HAND HELD BREATH TESTING GIZMO ON THE ROADSIDE THAT SAID HIS BREATH ALCOHOL CONCENTRATION WAS .14.  HE CHOSE TO TRY HIS LUCK ON THE BREATH TESTING GIZMO AT THE POLICE STATION AND BLEW AN ALLEGED RESULT OF .13 TWICE.  THE POLICE CHARGED HIM WITH DWI AND DWI PER SE.

READ ON TO SEE WHAT HAPPENED

NOT GUILTY ON BOTH DWI CHARGES-OCTOBER 2, 2007

Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com

Please note-this is an example of the disposition of a recent New Hampshire DWI case. It is by no means a guarantee of any particular result in any other case.

BASIC FACTS: At about 1:30 in the morning, a police officer saw two cars approaching.  Based on his opinion that the second car was following the lead car too closely, the officer activated his blue lights and stopped the driver of the second car.  The officer interrogated the driver about alcohol consumption with questions like “have you been drinking?” and “how many drinks have you had tonight?”  The officer ordered the driver to hand him his license and registration.  After the driver handed him the license and registration the officer ordered him out of the car for a series of agility maneuvers that most drivers fail called “field sobriety tests”.  The driver did not know that he could, and should, refuse these roadside gymnastics.  After a predictable series of “failed field sobriety tests”, the officer asked the driver to blow into a little battery operated gizmo called a “preliminary breath test”.  The driver blew into this gizmo, even though he didn’t have to.  The hand held gizmo said the driver’s BAC was .14.  The officer then arrested the driver and charged him with DWI-first offense.  Once at that the police station, the officer read the driver a form and asked him to take another breath test.  The driver took a chance and blew into the breath test box at the police station.  The box at the police station gave a reading of .13 twice.  The driver was charged with DWI and DWI per se.  The DWI per se charge is a charge that alleges that the driver’s “test” reading at the police station was .08 or higher, regardless of whether he was drunk or not.

 

After the arrest, the driver hired Attorney Stevens to fight the DWI charges.

DEFENSE:     Actual innocence.  At trial, Attorney Stevens was able to get all of the alleged breath test results excluded (thrown out).  The remainder of the evidence was insufficient to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  The defendant was found NOT GUILTY on both DWI charges after trial. 

RESULT:       NOT GUILTY ON DWI CHARGES!!!

Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!!!

 

May the Lord answer you in the day of trouble! May the name of the God of Jacob set you up on high.  Psalm 20:1.





Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email, please include ONLY the following information:


I will call you back at the earliest opportunity. Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice message or email. We will discuss that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.

Back to Top of This Page






Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.

www.1-800-dial-dui.com

Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2007, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.