Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway
Salem, NH 03079
Telephone: (603) 893-0074
Fax: (603) 893-5022
info@attorneymarkstevens.com
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals.

DWI CASE EXAMPLE: WEEK OF AUGUST 3, 2007

CLIENT CHARGED WITH DWI-DRUGS  

DWI CASE EXAMPLE: DRIVER STOPPED AFTER ARGUMENT WITH OTHER CITIZENS. THE DRIVER THEN ALLEGEDLY “FAILED” THREE FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS, AND TOLD POLICE HE HAD 7 OR 8 BEERS.  AT THE STATION HE BLEW A .00 TWICE ACCORDING TO THE POLICE BREATH TESTING GADGET.  SURE THEY COULD NOT BE WRONG ABOUT THEIR INTIAL OPINION THAT THE DRIVER WAS DRUNK, THE POLICE LAUNCHED INTO A DRUG IMPAIRMENT INVESTIGATION, DURING WHICH THE DRIVER ADMITTING TAKING SOME OXYCONTIN AND MADE OTHER STATEMENTS THAT WOULD NOT BE HELPFUL FROM A DEFENSE STANDPOINT.

READ ON TO SEE WHAT HAPPENED AT  TRIAL

MOTION TO SUPPRESS ALL STATEMENTS GRANTED-

MIRANDA RIGHTS VIOLATED

WEEK OF AUGUST 3, 2007

Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com

Please note-this is an example of the disposition of a recent New Hampshire DWI case. It is by no means a guarantee of any particular result in any other case.

BASIC FACTS: A police officer responded to the scene of an alleged argument.  Upon arrival the police made contact with two citizens who had contact with the driver.  The police approached the driver and made the usual stock observations that precipitate a DWI arrest.

The officer claimed the driver’s speech was slurred and that he seemed incoherent.  The police officer then orchestrated the driver’s performance through a medley of sidewalk gymnastics called “field sobriety tests”.  The driver allegedly failed a pen test (police call these horizontal gaze nystagmus, or “HGN” tests), a “nine step walk and turn test”, and a “one leg stand test”.  The driver admitted drinking “8 beers before losing count” several hours prior to driving.  After the battery of the balancing and pen-following exercises, the officer arrested the driver and charged him with DWI.  The driver decided to risk blowing into the breath testing gadget at the police station.  He blew a .00 twice.  Unfazed by the zero readings, the police mounted a “drug impairment” evaluation.  The defendant was interrogated about drug use and made numerous statements.

 

The Miranda card used by the police was defective, as it did not accurately state the warnings required by the Miranda Court.  The defendant later submitted to a blood test that revealed the presence of controlled drugs.

After his arrest, the defendant hired Attorney Stevens to fight the DWI charge.

DEFENSE:     Attorney Stevens moved to suppress the driver’s statements based on the Miranda violation.  After arguments on the suppression motion, hearing, the Court ordered that none of the defendant’s statements would be admissible at trial.  The state proceeded without the defendant’s statements.  The state presented the testimony of three witnesses at trial.  At the conclusion of all this, Attorney Stevens moved to dismiss the case of for a finding of not guilty.  The driver was found not guilty after trial!

RESULT:       NOT GUILTY AFTER TRIAL!!!

Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!!!





Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email, please include ONLY the following information:


I will call you back at the earliest opportunity. Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice message or email. We will discuss that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.

Back to Top of This Page






Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.

www.1-800-dial-dui.com

Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2007, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.