|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@attorneymarkstevens.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
CASE EXAMPLE-MARCH 28, 2007
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED-1ST OFFENSE
DEFENDANT STOPPED FOR DRIVING WITHOUT HEADLIGHTS ON
Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com
Please note-this is an example of the disposition of a recent New Hampshire DWI case. It is by no means a guaranty of any particular result in any other case.
The officers smelled alcohol, and the defendant admitted having two glasses of wine with dinner. The police demanded his license and registration and then they ordered him from his car. The driver submitted to a battery of sidewalk gymnastics called “field sobriety tests”, unaware that he could refuse to take part in the “testing” process. After the field sobriety testing ritual, the officer arrested him. He did a “pen test”, also known as the “Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus” test, which is when the officer waives his pen in front of the driver’s face and decides the driver is drunk because his pupils move side to side. He went on to fail the nine step walk and turn test (the “walk the line” test) and the “one leg stand test”. During the “walk the line” test the driver walked part of the second series of steps backwards, like the “moonwalk” dance of the early 80s. He then refused to blow into a hand held, battery operated breath testing gizmo that the officer carried around with him. The driver was arrested for DWI. He refused to blow into the drunk-in-the-box at the police station.
PLEA OFFER: None. The state offered no break for this highly cooperative driver who had no prior history of DWI or any other kind of criminal record. This gave the defendant no option but to fight the case.
DEFENSE: Actual innocence and sobriety. At trial, Attorney Stevens pointed out the large number of facts that were consistent with sobriety, including the way the driver actually performed during the field sobriety testing ritual.
TRIAL RESULT: NOT GUILTY!!!!!
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense and victory!!!
Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email,
please include ONLY the following information:
I will call you back at the earliest opportunity.
Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice
message or email. We will discuss
that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.
Back to Top of This Page
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice
and does not constitute an
engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated
with the Mark Stevens
Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general
nature and may not apply to any
particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that
laws change frequently. We will
make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but
are under no obligation to do so. No
part of this document, nor any information contained in this website,
may be disseminated without this
paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
www.1-800-dial-dui.com
Copyright 2006, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.